World Health Organization Still Assessing Bird Flu Threat

May 24th, 2008 by admin

Bird or Avian Influenza has killed more than 68 people in several Asian countries, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and news reports. Although health officials say panic isn’t warranted at this point, the evidence is ample to create serious concerns.

Whether the potentially-lethal H5N1 strain of the disease has made the leap from bird-to-human to human-to-human transmission has yet to be determined, said Daniel Epstein, information officer with the WHO’s Washington, D.C.-based regional office. WHO is the United Nations specialized agency for health and among the foremost organizations dealing with the infectious illness.

“I think we’re at the stage of still assessing the threat,” Epstein said. On the WHO’s scale, the Avian Flu situation ranks at a No. 3, with the least problematic threats coming in at No. 1 and the most serious at No. 6.

That No. 3 rating is based on no or limited human-to-human transmission of the disease, Epstein said, adding health officials worldwide are studying whether human-to-human transmission is occurring. People living on the same farms in some areas of the world have come down with the disease, but it’s uncertain whether they picked up the illness from each other or from fowl on those same farms, Epstein explained.

If evidence surfaces that the “unpredictable” Avian Flu virus has started moving through human-to-human transmission, the seriousness of the situation will rise to a No. 4 ranking, he said.
There are other, conflicting reports as to whether human-to-human transmission has occurred. Even so, those reports point to limited transmission only.

Generally, the disease attacks birds or, less commonly, pigs, However, it continuously mutates and is spread through bird migration, ultimately attacking humans, making it more of a potential threat outside Asia.For example, the disease was recently reported as appearing in the Arab world for the first time.

In addition, a subtype of H5N1 has turned up in North America, at a west-coast Canadian poultry farm. Even though the virus found in a commercial duck there was deemed to be a “low pathogenic North American strain,” according to the Canadian Press, that find prompted the slaughter of 60,000 birds as a precaution against the disease’s spread. The U.S. has also taken trade action against the Canadian province of British Columbia as a result, although far bigger and costly bird culls have gone ahead in other jurisdictions to prevent the spread of the virus in the past.

“This confirmation means we’re looking at a virus capable of causing only a mild disease (in birds), if any at all,” Cornelius Kiley, a veterinarian and Canadian Food Inspection Agency worker, said of the British Columbia situation.
The expanding geography associated with H5N1 is one of the reasons many are concerned a pandemic - a worldwide spread of the disease - is possible.

But the lack of available information on bird migration pathways and the influenzas that hit avian populations is, among other things, making it tough for public health experts to battle the disease.
“We would be so far ahead of the game right now if we knew more about the actual natural history and what the wild-type viruses actually do in these waterfowl populations or bird populations in general,” David Stallknecht, a Bird Flu specialist at the University of Georgia’s college of veterinary medicine in Athens, told the Canadian Press.
“The lack of funding and the lack of appreciation for knowing what these wild-type viruses do, I think has put us behind,” he said.
The maintenance of general good health through nutrition, vitamins and exercise to ward off the Avian Flu has been recommended by health officials. Even getting a regular flu shot - available for free from some public health groups in North America - has been suggested as a way to help ward off the flu.

For people who eat chicken or other fowl, cooking it at a minimum of 70 C or 158 F will kill any virus it contains, health officials on both sides of the Canadian-American border have said.
In addition, laboratory studies suggest that prescription medicines including Oseltamivir (commercial name: Tamiflu) and Relenza, which were licensed in the United States and Europe in 1999, could ward off the disease. Even so, the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) warns that flu viruses might become resistant to these drugs. More studies are needed to prove the medicines’ effectiveness, according to the organization’s Web site.

As for the WHO, it isn’t pushing either medication to combat the Bird Flu, Epstein said.
“(The drugs) will ease (Avian Flu) symptoms,” he said, but they’re not a cure for the disease.
However, other WHO officials have recommended that some countries stockpile Tamiflu in particular, as it prevents viruses from spreading from one infected group to another.
“(Tamiflu) is a broad spectrum drug,” Dr. Frederick Hayden, a clinical virologist at the University of Virginia, said in the Canadian edition of Reader’s Digest magazine. Flus can have nine different NA proteins and Tamiflu “has been shown to be effective against all of them. It reduces the duration of illness and the risk of complications and hospitalization,” Hayden said.

The drawbacks to Tamiflu are its relative high cost and short supply, Dr. Bruce Gellin, director of the U.S. National Vaccine Program Office, said in the magazine. But since 2003, Roche - a Swiss firm and the world’s only manufacturer of the drug - has stepped up Tamiflu production, boosting its output of the medication eightfold in the past two years. In addition, U.S.-based manufacturing facilities to produce the drug are in the works, according to the magazine.

The WHO is not recommending the use of virus-fighting face masks, which cover the nose and mouth, at this time to prevent the spread of the illness, Epstein said.
Such masks were used in Toronto, Canada in 2003 to combat the spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus in that city. SARS also emerged in several other cities throughout the world.
The WHO is working with public health agencies globally regarding the Bird Flu, Epstein said, to help ensure such things as communications plans - to keep the public informed in the event of a major outbreak - are in place.

Eric Schmiedl is a freelance journalist and a contributor to http://www.avian-flu-symptoms.com

Teamwork - How to Teach Your Organization to Work as a Team

May 23rd, 2008 by admin

Teamwork is not something that is easy to learn or teach. When it comes down to it, most of learning to work together as a team is developing the skill of communicating with and trusting the members of your team. When you are forming a team keep this in mind and try to create an environment where individuals can learn how to communicate and trust each other.

Often you can improve your team by creating a temporary environment that requires everyone to learn to communicate and trust each other. Many of the infamous corporate games and simulations help achieve this. One of the easiest ways to improve communication and trust is put individuals in a challenging situation and let them work their way out of it. Here are two ideas of ways to help create a temporary favorable to team growth:

Take your team out to paint walls at a local charity. In painting it is easy to see how much you’ve accomplished. This gets everyone working together in hands one way and solving problems. With the right activities it can really help improve the trust between team members. There is a lot of benefit in just forcing individuals to work together in a different type of environment.

Participate in one of the survival simulation type games. In these simulations your team has to work together to rank the most important objects to take with them after an airplane crash or similar disaster. This forces individuals to articulate their feelings and helps them work through conflicting viewpoints and opinions.

Leadership501 is a website with resources for leaders of organizations and small businesses Please visit http://www.leadership501.com to find out more about teaching teamwork and other leadership topics.

Is Your Organization at Risk Without a Sufficient Backup and Recovery System

May 22nd, 2008 by admin

What if you lost physical access to your office? Could you be back in business at another location within a couple of days? If not, you should explore cost-effective, reliable backup choices.

No one ever thinks it could happen to them. Yet, we have all seen and possibly experienced the devastation that can be caused from natural disasters, accidental file destruction or even terrorist attacks. Everyone needs to think about what would happen if all business operations suddenly came to a halt. Could your business recover if you lost all of your data?

Data backups is a subject so overdone that it has become “incidental”. Today, everyone knows that they need to be taking backups of their system data and the big issue today is that everyone “assumes” that this is being done at their companies. Network people are hired to install the network and “everybody” naturally assumes that this was part of the set-up and that somehow this is magically being taken care of. This is a big mistake.

All companies, large and small, need to have a secure backup and recovery plan in place. The key word here is perhaps “recovery”. Having been in the software business for over 20 years, I am no longer amazed when companies routinely perform backups and yet never test them to see if they are actually working. When it comes time to restore, it’s an unpleasant surprise to find out that the backup wasn’t really backing anything up or it was not backing up the correct files.

Having a sound plan in place extends farther than simply running a tape every night (which by the way is mandatory step one in the process). In addition, tapes need to be rotated each night so that the same tape is not being used over and over again. One never knows when one may need to recover data from a couple of days ago because the current data is not good. A tape should exist for each day of the week that the system gets backed up (minimum 5 days). Besides the rotation, copies should be kept off site, preferably in a safety deposit box and/or another secure location that is not in the immediate area of the office. It should be a site that can be accessed quickly if data needs to be retrieved. Ideally, the off-site copy should be refreshed at least once a month.

Besides the daily backup tapes, backups should be taken at the end of the month, quarter and year. These backups should never be used again and should be clearly labeled in the event that you need to access the data. If you are doing payroll, the government can call at anytime, even in several years. You want to be prepared. Not being able to produce the data can mean penalties, legal and accounting fees.

Running a backup tape and keeping it off site is just the beginning of the process. Backups need to be periodically tested to ensure that data is being copied. A knowledgeable, technical person should be in charge of this task. The line, “you can never have enough backups” is very true. However, testing that the backup you are taking is “good” is equally important.

Having a good routine for taking, testing and storing backups is critical. If your data is protected, even if you do not have access to your office and even if your server is destroyed, you can always restore on another system at another site. We had customers that had offices near ground zero and were unable to return to their buildings for quite some time. In a couple of days, with good backup tapes, they were able to restore to new hardware at another location and were back in business within a couple of days. Being prepared is the difference between business recovery and business failure.

In addition to the physical backup plan, every company should have a plan in writing that outlines the steps that the company will take to recover and resume work at locations other than the office. The plan should encompass not only the steps that will be taken to restore the data, but how and where the employees will access the data. If remote access is possible how would that option work? Would multiple offices be blended into one temporary central location? Several possibilities and solutions should be available so that most situations can be addressed without a last minute appeal for a solution.

A disaster represents many challenges, most of which cannot be prepared for. Restoration of data and resumption of use of the data is one thing that can be arranged. Unfortunately, this type of plan is traditionally not a top priority and considered secondary to the core business operations. The primary point to keep in mind, however, is that it is essential to securing and preserving core business operations. The smart business choice is a solid backup and recovery plan.

Terri Roeslmeier is president of Automated Business Designs, Inc., software developer of Ultra-Staff, a full-featured staffing software solution with components for front office, back office and the web. http://www.abd.net





Close
E-mail It